| |
NEVUS
SEBACEOUS - TO TREAT OR NOT TO TREAT ?
THAT
IS THE QUESTION
presented by David
Elpern MD (1) and Jag Bhawan MD
(2)
(1) Williamstown, MA,
USA
(2) Boston, MA, USA
on April 26, 2004
(1) Dermatologist, The Skin
Clinic, Williamstown, MA, USA
(2) Professor of Dermatology
and Pathology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts,
USA
References
-
Cribier B, Scrivener Y, Grosshans E. Tumors arising
in nevus sebaceus: A study of 596 cases J Am Acad Dermatol. 2000
Feb;42(2 Pt 1):263-8. The rate of malignant tumors arising
on NS was very low and we did not observe such cases in children,
who had associated benign tumors in only 1.7% of cases. Benign
neoplasms were common and most of them occurred on the scalp;
this was not a bias resulting from a longer
duration before surgery. Trichoblastoma and not basal cell carcinoma
was the most frequent follicular tumor associated with NS and
showed a striking female predominance. Most trichoblastomas had
previously been misdiagnosed but could actually be easily recognized
by typical histologic features. Because most tumors occurred in
adults older than 40 years, our study suggests that prophylactic
surgery in young children is of uncertain benefit. Clinical follow-up
is probably sufficient, and even those cases with clinical changes
often proved to be benign tumors or warts.
-
Santibanez-Gallerani A, Marshall D, Duarte AM, Melnick
SJ, Thaller S. Should nevus sebaceus of Jadassohn in children
be excised? A study of 757 cases, and literature review. J Craniofac
Surg. 2003 Sep;14(5):658-60. The incidence of basal cell carcinoma
and the need for prophylactic excision in children with nevus
sebaceus of Jadassohn have been a topic of controversy. The authors
performed a retrospective analysis of 757 cases from 1996 to 2002
in children aged 16 years or younger. No cases of basal cell cancer
were found in the nevus sebaceus group. Recent studies in children
corroborate these findings and question the need for prophylactic
surgical removal of the nevus sebaceus.
|
|